Question: Does Anyone Have 1st Hand Experineces With Unsecured Debt Settlement?

One Comment

1. Jason says:

   January 25, 2012 at 9:50 pm

   The answer to the question “which debt settlement program should I choose?” is very simple: NONE OF THEM… but not for the reasons that most people offer. I’ll advise you not choose a debt settlement company because – even if you find a high-integrity, ethical debt settlement company – there is a far superior alternative: DEBT RESOLUTION. The concepts are similar, but Debt Resolution provides benefits that debt settlement can not offer, at a better price. I only have room for a limited explanation, but here are some of the key (very vital) differences between debt settlement and debt resolution.

   Basically, debt settlement companies act as a collection agencies for the credit card companies. They get involved before the creditor refers the account to an outside agency, collect a bundle of money from the borrower over time, take their hefty fees, and offer the balance to the creditor as a settlement. They are PRIVATE COMPANIES offering a service. They do not and can not represent the borrower.

   Debt resolution, alternatively, is an attorney-managed administer whereby an attorney negotiates with the creditor on the borrower’s behalf. This is a legal transaction that only an attorney can perform, and results in a matured mitigation on the borrower’s behalf. There are some critical advantages to this.

   Key differences between debt settlement and debt resolution:

   PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE – Debt settlement companies cannot guarantee a settlement amount. Debt Resolution guarantees settlement at 45% of the first debt (which also includes the attorney fees). Also, with Debt Resolution, no additional fees will be requested if the debt increases after the agreement is signed, which is very vital because once credit card payments get behind, fees and rate hikes get applied to the account, significantly increasing the balance. Debt settlement companies may take advantage of this by charging fees on the balance when the account is matured, not the first balance. And since plans may take several being to complete, balances (and the corresponding fees) can increase dramatically.

   TAX CONSEQUENCES – Debt settlement companies generally don’t top out to borrowers that when a creditor agrees to settle, they generally send the borrower an IRS Form 1099 for the amount written-off. This means that if the borrower has $ 50,000 in unsecured debt, and the creditor accepts 60%, or $ 30,000 as a settlement, they will send the borrower a Form 1099 which shows that $ 20,000 write-off as income to the borrower. Even even if the borrower didn’t receive any actual cash from the creditor, they may still have to pay tax on $ 20,000 of additional income. With the attorney-managed Debt Resolution program, the resolved amount is a legal agreement between the parties, and since no cash was provided to the borrower in the form of actual income from the creditor, THERE ARE NO TAX CONSEQUENCES.

   CREDITOR HARASSMENT – Debt settlement companies can’t represent a borrower, so they can’t really stop harassing phone calls from collection agents. They may clarify that the borrower is in a debt settlement program, but that could potentially backfire and produce the creditor to accelerate their collection efforts, or even file a complaint. The attorney–managed Debt Resolution system leverages excellent faith debt laws to protect consumer rights. Once the creditor receives the first letter from the attorney, they are prohibited by law from pursuing collection efforts against a consumer who withholds payments due to a excellent faith billing dispute. If the creditor still communicates with the borrower, the borrower should report the attorney, who will inform the creditor why they have no right to pursue further collection efforts.

   FEES AND ALLOCATION OF PAYMENTS – Debt Resolution is, in most cases, significantly less expensive than debt settlement… and the fee organize is completely transparent. The Debt Resolution administration and processing is just 5% of the total contracted debt (compared to 10-15% or more that most debt settlement companies charge). And that 5% is based on the balances on the contract date, not the settlement date – so increasing balances will NOT upshot in increased fees. Debt Resolution also has a one-time $ 500 enrollment fee to establish the paperwork and accounts, and compensate the attorney for efforts to stop collection calls, etc… Some debt settlement companies don’t charge an upfront fee to enroll, but they “adjoin-load” their monthly payments with fees – a majority of the payment for the first several months goes toward company fees rather than into the borrower’s settlement account (so they still get their money upfront). Some even charge monthly fees on top of their high percentage fee.

   These are just a few of the reasons (there are more) why Debt Resolution is superior to debt settlement. If you’re friend is seriously interested in resolving their $ 70,000 unsecured debt for $ 31,500 (plus a $ 500 enrollment fee), and desires to do so while avoiding harassing creditor calls, bolt from the blue tax bills, and very expensive fees, visit www.BetterThanDebtSettlement.com.

   Reply